Send
Print
Thestrategist.media – 24 April 2015 – The economist.com reports that the U.S. President Barak Obama is waiting to sign up trade deals which would prove to be the biggest ever in the history of America. The deals in questions will affect the “Trans-Pacific Partnership” by linking twelve economies along the rim of the Pacific accounting forty percent of the “world GDP”, whereby Singapore and Japan would get connect with the American Continent.
The task of the “Trans-Pacific Partnership”, in short T.T.P. would include tackling “intellectual property”, maintaining environmental and labour standards besides “dismantling tariff barriers”. As per the economist.com, the “trade negotiators” of the America “predicts” that:
The task of the “Trans-Pacific Partnership”, in short T.T.P. would include tackling “intellectual property”, maintaining environmental and labour standards besides “dismantling tariff barriers”. As per the economist.com, the “trade negotiators” of the America “predicts” that:
“...by 2025 the TPP will make the world $220 billion a year richer.”
However, many democrats are against the T.T.P union, although the “Republicans in Congress” are in consent with President Obama. Keeping the “geopolitical” aspect in mind, America needs to have healthy bonds with the Asian nations, although America doesn’t form part of China’s “Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank” project. Nevertheless, if the T.T.P ties with the twelve countries turn out successful then America can “retain its sway in Asia” even without the Chinese support.
It has been argued by the Republicans and President Obama that the T.T.P deal “would make America richer”. In the midst of high public support in “foreign trade”, possible income growth by 2025, the Republicans still hold on to their views while the percent of support received by the Democrats are in the rise. However, a strong “opposition to the deal” still remains. The post notes:
“Many fret that imports from low-cost countries such as Vietnam will hurt American workers in industries such as carmaking and textiles.”
Many studies show that trade has affected the worker’s, especially of blue-collared ones’, in the first world countries, although one cannot “blame trade deals” for everything. In fact, American imports with India “have more than doubled over the past decade” in spite of the fact that there is no trade deal between them. According to many democrats, Bill Clinton’s deal with Mexico and Canada, namely NAFTA, proved to be “a disaster” while most economists don’t see it causing “have much effect on the labour market”. Similarly, the present deal in question too would help in “trade-adjustment assistance”.
However, due the secretive negotiations many anxious as “American workers, human rights and the environment” can be greatly affected by “global corporate agenda”. Nevertheless, the T.T.P agreements include provisions to ensure “workers’ right”. Furthermore, the post informs:
“Other parts of the TPP will irk greens. In recent months America seems to have softened its language on the environment, possibly to win over poorer trading partners. Mr Levin complains that the TPP ‘does not address whether or how climate-change issues should be handled’.”
Nevertheless, the secrecy over the negotiations has begun to rouse controversial opinions, though Jeffrey Schott argues that the secrecy is “to balance the demands of competing interest groups”. However, amid various speculations about the trade deal, the senior democrats attempt to stick to the plan, by saying:
“...that a final trade agreement must be subject to public consultation before Congress votes”.
